Triple Gynecological Disease: Endometriosis, adenomyosis and myomatosis
pdf (Español (España))
html (Español (España))

Keywords

Deep endometriosis
Uterine Leiomyomatosis
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Adenomyosis

How to Cite

1.
Chaul L, Rojas Lledes MF, Cabrera Carranco R, Sierra Brozón AG, Kondo W, Menocal Tavernier A, Hochstein Dominguez D, Bautista González MF, Barroso Alverde MJ, Vasco Rivero M, Vera Hernández PS, González Galarza M, J. Ovando Álvaro. Triple Gynecological Disease: Endometriosis, adenomyosis and myomatosis. RSAEGRE [Internet]. 2026 Jul. 28 [cited 2026 Jul. 30];33(2):7-18. Available from: https://www.revistasaegre.com.ar/index.php/revista/article/view/55

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The concept of “triple gynaecological disease” describe the coexistence of endometriosis, adenomyosis, and uterine leiomyomatosis, entities that share pathophysiological mechanisms and clinical overlap. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with a dedicated endometriosis mapping protocol represents an integral tool for their simultaneous evaluation. PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively evaluate the frequency and distribution pattern of the coexistence of endometriosis, adenomyosis, and uterine leiomyomas (UL) in MRI studies performed using a dedicated endometriosis mapping protocol. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: To analyze morphological correlations and highlight the diagnostic value of MRI for the simultaneous detection of these pathologies. METHODS: Two databases from Instituto Doyenne were retrospectively analyzed, including reproductive-age women with clinical suspicion of endometriosis, adenomyosis, or uterine leiomyomatosis. Individual and combined MRI findings were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 419 patients were evaluated. Adenomyosis was identified in 90.9% of cases, leiomyomatosis in 28.6%, and 24.8% met criteria for “triple pathology.” Intramural fibroids were the most frequent subtype (60%). Deep infiltrating rectal endometriosis was identified in 39.1% of cases, with C2 nodules (1–3 cm) being the most prevalent. Adenomyosis was significantly associated with a lower probability of superficial endometriosis (OR 0.129; p=0.001). DISCUSSION: The significant coexistence of these pathologies supports the concept of “triple gynecological disease” and emphasizes the need for an integral diagnostic approach using MRI.

pdf (Español (España))
html (Español (España))

References

Bulun SE, Yildiz S, Adli M, et al. Endometriosis and adenomyosis: shared pathophysiology. Fertil Steril. 2023;119(5):746-750. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.03.006

Ottolina J, Villanacci R, D’Alessandro S, et al. Endometriosis and adenomyosis: modern concepts of their clinical outcomes, treatment, and management. J Clin Med. 2024;13(14):3996. doi:10.3390/jcm13143996

Vercellini P, Viganò P, Bandini V, et al. Association of endometriosis and adenomyosis with pregnancy and infertility. Fertil Steril. 2023;119(5):727-740. doi:10.1016/j. fertnstert.2023.03.018

Habiba M, Guo SW, Benagiano G. Are adenomyosis andendometriosis phenotypes of the same disease process? Biomolecules. 2023;14(1). doi:10.3390/biom14010032

Mitranovici MI, Chiorean DM, Moraru L, et al. Shared pathogenic and therapeutic characteristics of endometriosis, adenomyosis, and endometrial cancer: a comprehensive literature review. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024;17(3):311. doi:10.3390/ph17030311

Pausch M. Enzian and adenomyosis. Eur J Gynecol. 2024;22(1):134-147.Gruber

Gruber TM, Ortlieb L, Henrich W, Mechsner S. Deep infiltrating endometriosis and adenomyosis: implications on pregnancy and outcome. J Clin Med. 2021;11(1):157. doi:10.3390/jcm11010157

Donnez J, Dolmans MM, Nisolle M. Coexistence of endometriosis, adenomyosis, and uterine fibroids: a complex gynecological disorder. J Reprod Med. 2024;21(4):201-215

Yang Q, Ciebiera M, Bariani MV, et al. Comprehensive review of uterine fibroids: developmental origin, pathogenesis, and treatment. Endocr Rev. 2022;43(4):678-719. doi:10.1210/endrev/bnab039

Sharon Johnatty SE, Stewart CJR, Smith D, et al. Coexistence of leiomyomas, adenomyosis and endometriosis in women with endometrial cancer. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):3621. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-59916-1

Kabodmehri R, Etezadi A, Sharami SH, Ghanaei MM, Hosseinzadeh F, Dalil Heirati SF, et al. The association between chronic endometritis and uterine fibroids. J Family Med Prim Care. 2022;11(2):653-659. doi:10.4103/jfmpc. jfmpc_1470_21

Ortega D. Qué tipos de miomas uterinos existen: 8 categorías distintas. Inovaintervencionismo.com. INOVA Radiología Intervencionista; 2024. [Disponible en: https://inovaintervencionismo.com/tipos-de-miomas/][Último acceso: 31/03/2026]

Méndez Fernández R, Barrera Ortega J. Resonancia magnética de la endometriosis pelviana. Radiologia. 2017;59(4):286-296. doi:10.1016/j.rx.2017.02.002

Uimari O, Nazri H, Tapmeier T. Endometriosis and uterine fibroids (leiomyomata): comorbidity, risks and implications. Front Reprod Health. 2021;3:750018. doi:10.3389/frph.2021.750018

Keckstein J, Hudelist G, Koninckx P, et al. The #Enzian classification for the diagnosis and surgery of endometriosis: a narrative review. Gynecol Pelvic Med. 2021;4:40. [Disponible en: https://gpm.amegroups.org/article/view/7815/html] [Último acceso: 31/03/2026].

Mishra I, Melo P, Easter C, Sephton V, Dhillon-Smith R, Coomarasamy A, et al. Prevalence of adenomyosis in women with subfertility: systematic review and metaanalysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023;62(1):23-41. doi:10.1002/uog.26159 Wang YX, Farland LV, Gaskins AJ, et al. Endometriosis and uterine fibroids and risk of premature mortality: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2024;387:e078797. doi:10.1136/bmj-2023-078797

Gallo JL, Pérez-Herrezuelo I, Díaz MA, Tirado P, Montoya F. Adenomiosis: una afección uterina frecuente. Clin Invest Ginecol Obstet. 2006;33(2):59-63. doi:10.1016/S0210-573X(06)74085-0

VanNoy BN, Bowleg L, Marfori C, Moawad G, Zota AR. Black women’s psychosocial experiences with seeking surgical treatment for uterine fibroids: implications for clinical practice. Womens Health Issues. 2021;31(3):263-270. doi:10.1016/j.whi.2021.01.001

Ros Cerro C, Puente Águeda JM. Diagnóstico ecográfico de la endometriosis y los miomas. Clin Invest Ginecol Obstet. 2023;50(2):100844. doi:10.1016/j.gine.2023.100844

Kobayashi H, Matsubara S, et al. Proposal for a new classification system of adenomyosis based on magnetic resonance imaging. Hum Reprod. 2020;35(5):973-982. doi:10.1093/humrep/deaa048

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. doi:10.1136/bmj.n71

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ.

;372:n71. doi:10.1136/bmj.n71

Esta obra está bajo licencia internacional

licencias

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.es 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.